No longer single CPU
Thread Level Parallelism - Design Decisions on Ace’s Hardware
I hesitate to recommend this article. It has some good points, but quite a few bad points. I’ll share:
It’s too long
It’s too hardware centric (I’m a software guy. I care most about how to write software for the new CPUs)
I don’t agree with his view of the “low-end” (2 proc servers) market or the games or console market. He seems to indicate that Hyper-Threading is useless at the bottom end. Also, he seems to think that dual-core has no use in the home market. But then he makes an exception for the PS3 (contradicting himself, in my opinion).
I don’t agree with his view of marketing and licensing issues. Software vendors have already said that they won’t stand in the way of multi-core CPUs. They’ve indicated that they would be flexible.
I bring this article up because:
Just like 64-bit processors, systems with multiple CPUs (or multiple cores) are coming soon (or already here!)
We need to write code to support this. On a Hyper-Threaded dual-processor system, the OS sees 4 CPUs! When you run Doom3 on it for example, it’s only using 25% of the CPU. What a waste! When dual-core CPUs come out, it’ll be even more important to find a way to keep those CPUs busy.
The CPU terminology is getting confusing. We’ve got multi-processor, multi-core, and multiple threads per core. Add Hyper-Threading to the mix, and it gets hard to sort everything out.
This entry was posted
on Monday, December 13th, 2004 at 5:53 pm and is filed under computers.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Yes it is going to be quite interesting to see how software makers adapt to the changing marketplace with the addition of multiple core cpu’s come out in less than a year for the general populace.